Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 101% UFO	Workstation 49% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	41.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	335% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS PRO (all builds)
Memory	28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190802
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 17 '19 at 23:58
Run Duration	337 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	96.6% Outstanding	Memory 82.6 1-Core 149 2-Core 299 95% 177 Pts	4-Core 592 8-Core 1,051 99% 822 Pts	64-Core 1,452 90% 1,452 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 96.6% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% MSI(1462 3602) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 431.60 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	41.2% Average	Lighting 45.9 Reflection 55 Parallax 44.7 37% 48.5 fps	MRender 68.2 Gravity 47.6 Splatting 62.2 49% 59.3 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 380GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2345 833 831 835 835 837 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	335% Outstanding	Read 2,701 Write 2,635 Mixed 1,883 SusWrite 1086 465% 2,076 MB/s	4K Read 71.1 4K Write 188 4K Mixed 99.8 335% 120 MB/s	DQ Read 1,364 DQ Write 1,155 DQ Mixed 1,264 946% 1,261 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 335% Great: 355%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 97GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 296 295 297 296 297 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 494 Write 449 Mixed 413 SusWrite 314 94% 417 MB/s	4K Read 42.6 4K Write 96.9 4K Mixed 56.1 188% 65.2 MB/s	DQ Read 219 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 200 150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 124%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 208GB free Firmware: M3CR020 SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 430 430 433 429 405 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 501 Write 428 Mixed 415 SusWrite 426 100% 443 MB/s	4K Read 35.4 4K Write 89.9 4K Mixed 52 168% 59.1 MB/s	DQ Read 221 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 186 144% 198 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 125%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 366GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 453 450 453 449 448 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 494 Write 445 Mixed 400 SusWrite 451 101% 448 MB/s	4K Read 42.6 4K Write 93.8 4K Mixed 56.8 187% 64.4 MB/s	DQ Read 219 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 200 150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 134%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 124GB free Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 624 312 306 305 302 301 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	222% Outstanding	Read 2035 Write 1,359 Mixed 547 SusWrite 358 237% 1,075 MB/s	4K Read 45 4K Write 151 4K Mixed 60.2 225% 85.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1,094 DQ Write 1,159 DQ Mixed 814 698% 1,022 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 222% Great: 236%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$80 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 137 139 139 143 143 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	84.3% Excellent	Read 154 Write 138 Mixed 99 SusWrite 140 98% 133 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 84.3% Great: 88%
Lexar JumpDrive 128GB 44 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 34GB free, PID a20a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 97 97 97 97 97 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	50.8% Above average	Read 200 Write 96.9 Mixed 86 SusWrite 96.8 146% 120 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 10% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2Z3200C16 2x16GB 8,563 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	96.5% Outstanding	MC Read 38.7 MC Write 27.1 MC Mixed 38.6 99% 34.8 GB/s	SC Read 25.9 SC Write 26.2 SC Mixed 36.6 84% 29.6 GB/s	Latency 75.8 53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 96.5% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X570 AORUS PRO Builds (Compare 1,965 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 182%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 181%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS PRO

CPU
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $180Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	357x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $260Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	326x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	284x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	155x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	129x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	113x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $86Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	163x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	142x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	95x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	76x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $103Bench 88%, 110,884 samples	57x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBKingstonBench 90%, 54,651 samples	45x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $1,176

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16