Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics57.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 970M Pro3  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160617
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateAug 15 '19 at 20:21
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 33%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8370E-$471
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Memory 81
1-Core 49.4
2-Core 91.8
49% 74.1 Pts
4-Core 163
8-Core 266
26% 214 Pts
64-Core 283
18% 283 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Lighting 71
Reflection 75.3
Parallax 65.7
58% 70.7 fps
MRender 71
Gravity 69.9
Splatting 71.7
58% 70.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_M550_MTFDDAV128MAY 128GB
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 175 192 195 191 194 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 296
Write 342
Mixed 256
SusWrite 193
61% 272 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 49.4
4K Mixed 28.1
96% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 29.6
DQ Write 68.5
DQ Mixed 34.4
30% 44.2 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 98%
Seagate ST2000VM003-1CT164 2TB
630GB free
Firmware: SC23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 145 149 140 151 140 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Read 135
Write 141
Mixed 61.3
SusWrite 145
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
108% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9U5471-032.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
29.4% Poor
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 8.6
27% 9.53 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 9.3
25% 8.67 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 848 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback