Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.45% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170607
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateMar 15 '21 at 11:11
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8300-$168
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
64.4% Good
Memory 88.2
1-Core 67.5
2-Core 128
59% 94.5 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 336
34% 279 Pts
64-Core 328
20% 328 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Gigabyte(1458 36B8) 1GB
CLim: 1006 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.45% Terrible
Lighting 9.3
Reflection 13
Parallax 10.4
8% 10.9 fps
MRender 11.4
Gravity 8.3
Splatting 7.4
7% 9.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.45%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDPR-PX500-256-80 256GB
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0614B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 210 339 434 471 680 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 891
Write 71.7
Mixed 123
SusWrite 380
79% 366 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 94.4
4K Mixed 33.5
146% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 448
DQ Write 66.1
DQ Mixed 134
130% 216 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 114%
Great: 222%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9U5471-032.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
45.5% Average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 14.7
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 11.8
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 906 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $588
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback