MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive222% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190604
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 13 '19 at 13:47
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$160
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Memory 88.1
1-Core 152
2-Core 297
97% 179 Pts
4-Core 586
8-Core 1,152
103% 869 Pts
64-Core 1,445
89% 1,445 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDHL500GB-D8 500GB
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1115F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 676 534 823 236 143 144 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 1,809
Write 1,560
Mixed 1,197
SusWrite 426
278% 1,248 MB/s
4K Read 60.6
4K Write 209
4K Mixed 52.8
270% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 926
DQ Write 1,066
DQ Mixed 642
582% 878 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 222%
Great: 229%
Hitachi HUA723030ALA640 3TB-$37
2.5TB free
Firmware: MKAOAA10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 141 142 142 143 144 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Read 138
Write 134
Mixed 77
SusWrite 142
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 87%
Seagate Expansion Desk 320GB
208GB free, PID 3320
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 103 102 104 104 102 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43% Average
Read 100
Write 56.5
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 102
106% 80.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 43%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C19 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3600 MHz clocked @ 1800 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
MC Read 31.2
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 34.6
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 26.5
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 36.3
85% 29.9 GB/s
Latency 69.5
58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 6,119 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) - $160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $951
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback