Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive275% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200527
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 08 '21 at 17:40
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K-$122
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Memory 95.9
1-Core 144
2-Core 285
97% 175 Pts
4-Core 544
8-Core 824
85% 684 Pts
64-Core 815
50% 815 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 103%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$98
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 729 417 412 403 404 399 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
275% Outstanding
Read 2,491
Write 2,204
Mixed 1,376
SusWrite 460
363% 1,633 MB/s
4K Read 68.3
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 89
298% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1007
DQ Write 1,468
DQ Mixed 1,162
900% 1,212 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 275%
Great: 280%
Kingston A400 120GB-$34
74GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 132 133 132 88 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
73% Very good
Read 310
Write 132
Mixed 174
SusWrite 121
41% 184 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 80.1
4K Mixed 37.7
133% 48.5 MB/s
DQ Read 231
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 103
125% 215 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 73%
Great: 85%
SSD Smartbuy 120GB
31GB free
Firmware: SBFM21.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 86 195 135 233 240 MB/s
Performing below potential (53rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
65.6% Good
Read 255
Write 47.7
Mixed 79.7
SusWrite 178
31% 140 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 81.9
4K Mixed 24.5
118% 45 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 229
DQ Mixed 124
117% 181 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 91%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$8
14GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 7.1 6.7 6.9 6.1 5.8 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Read 73.8
Write 6.5
Mixed 9.2
SusWrite 6.8
21% 24.1 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 1.1
75% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C19 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 44.6
MC Write 46.9
MC Mixed 30.4
116% 40.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 47.3
SC Mixed 32.5
96% 33.7 GB/s
Latency 54.3
74% 54.3 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 113%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 7,812 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $810
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback