Gigabyte GA-880GM-USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics0.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-880GM-USB3  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 03 '19 at 01:54
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
62.6% Good
Memory 90.7
1-Core 52.7
2-Core 102
54% 81.7 Pts
4-Core 189
8-Core 270
29% 230 Pts
64-Core 243
15% 243 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4250
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
0.67% Terrible
Lighting 0.77
Reflection 1.85
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.04 fps
MRender 1.05
Gravity 0.13
Splatting 1.43
1% 0.87 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.67%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 178 99 100 124 130 MB/s
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.8% Average
Read 204
Write 176
Mixed 176
SusWrite 134
39% 173 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 56.2
4K Mixed 19.3
99% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 28.3
DQ Write 72.4
DQ Mixed 22.7
25% 41.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 100%
UFD USB Flash Drive 2GB
2GB free, PID a740
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 6.5 6.5 6.4 6.5 6.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
5.01% Terrible
Read 17.8
Write 5.5
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 6.4
10% 8.75 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.01%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
33.9% Below average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 12.8
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 10
21% 7.5 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-880GM-USB3 Builds (Compare 119 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-880GM-USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $203
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback