Today's hottest deals

HP h8-1030

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP h8-1030  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN 2A92
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110504
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 05 '22 at 23:53
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
48.5% Average
Memory 70.6
1-Core 42.4
2-Core 80.5
42% 64.5 Pts
4-Core 151
8-Core 175
21% 163 Pts
64-Core 222
14% 222 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$75
CLim: 1210 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.8.2
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Lighting 21.6
Reflection 26.8
Parallax 30.4
18% 26.3 fps
MRender 26.2
Gravity 25.5
Splatting 21.8
20% 24.5 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
3 60 GB SSD 60GB
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S033
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 203
Write 92.2
Mixed 186
36% 160 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 20.3
4K Mixed 7.1
42% 13.9 MB/s
DQ Read 96.5
DQ Write 96.3
DQ Mixed 14.5
33% 69.1 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 52%
WD WD5000AVVS-63H0B1 500GB
48GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 56 56 55 49 49 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
35% Below average
Read 69.4
Write 79.4
Mixed 57.4
SusWrite 52.2
48% 64.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 35%
Great: 51%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA632 1TB-$105
199GB free
Firmware: JP4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 66 49 49 47 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 66.8
Write 57.6
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 51.1
40% 53.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata HY64C1C1624ZY Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 Kingston 99U5403-036.A00LF Kingston 99U5403-036.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.3% Poor
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 11.8
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 7.3
16% 5.67 GB/s
Latency 99.9
40% 99.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical h8-1030 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP h8-1030

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $315
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback