Asus PRIME H270-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics54.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H270-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170104
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 26 '19 at 03:52
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
78% Very good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 109
2-Core 202
78% 134 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 574
56% 462 Pts
64-Core 558
34% 558 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 418.91
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Lighting 67.3
Reflection 67.8
Parallax 57.9
55% 64.3 fps
MRender 69.3
Gravity 63.7
Splatting 62.9
53% 65.3 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
352GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG5000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 24 66 37 154 149 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 383
Write 330
Mixed 260
SusWrite 110
60% 270 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 34.4
4K Mixed 16.9
61% 21.8 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 91.6
DQ Mixed 45
50% 83.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 61%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
613GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 144 145 144 144 144 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 119
Write 63.8
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 144
70% 96.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 109%
SD/MMC Card Reader 64GB
59GB free, PID 6335
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.42% Terrible
Read 3.5
Write 4
Mixed 3.5
SusWrite 4.2
5% 3.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.2
86% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.42%
Great: 6%
Toshiba External USB HDD 500GB
383GB free, PID a001
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 40 40 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
20.1% Poor
Read 39.2
Write 37.7
Mixed 26
SusWrite 40
48% 35.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 20%
WD My Passport 0820 2TB
287GB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 92 92 91 90 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 89.5
Write 89
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 91.7
108% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.8% Good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 24.3
MC Mixed 20.7
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 24.7
SC Mixed 22.1
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 65.1
61% 65.1 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H270-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,860 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H270-PLUS - $3,094

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $3,464
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback