ECT A_M_I

Performance Results


Gaming 55% Yacht	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	56.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	94.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	ECT A_M_I (all builds)
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z97X-Gaming 3
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160303
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 11 '21 at 07:46
Run Duration	185 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348 455,746 User benchmarks, average bench 79% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	90.2% Outstanding	Memory 94.9 1-Core 131 2-Core 252 90% 159 Pts	4-Core 461 8-Core 704 72% 583 Pts	64-Core 697 43% 697 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 90.2% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% MSI(1462 3160) CLim: 1605 MHz, MLim: 1902 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.49 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	56.1% Above average	Lighting 69.6 Reflection 77.3 Parallax 69.7 57% 72.2 fps	MRender 70.5 Gravity 70.2 Splatting 62.3 55% 67.7 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 283 273 263 254 247 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	94.7% Outstanding	Read 510 Write 420 Mixed 306 SusWrite 270 84% 376 MB/s	4K Read 36.3 4K Write 105 4K Mixed 38.6 160% 60 MB/s	DQ Read 281 DQ Write 134 DQ Mixed 130 117% 182 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 94.7% Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 165GB free Firmware: EXT0CB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 278 155 156 134 146 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	116% Outstanding	Read 502 Write 487 Mixed 408 SusWrite 220 91% 404 MB/s	4K Read 46.6 4K Write 116 4K Mixed 63.6 214% 75.5 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 350 DQ Mixed 250 219% 327 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 126%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC24 SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 153 156 156 156 156 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	80.9% Excellent	Read 129 Write 111 Mixed 80.2 SusWrite 153 87% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 113%
SD/MMC Card Reader 64GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 21GB free, PID 6335 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 3.2 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	1.84% Terrible	Read 3.2 Write 3.2 Mixed 3.2 SusWrite 3.3 4% 3.23 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.2 16% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.84% Great: 6%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 479GB free, PID 10a8 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	20.4% Poor	Read 40 Write 38 Mixed 28.4 SusWrite 38.2 49% 36.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 101% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 20.4% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 4x4GB 14,299 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	70.9% Very good	MC Read 25.6 MC Write 25.7 MC Mixed 21.8 70% 24.4 GB/s	SC Read 19.8 SC Write 24.8 SC Mixed 23.2 65% 22.6 GB/s	Latency 57.3 70% 57.3 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 64%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A_M_I Builds (Compare 149 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

System: ECT A_M_I

CPU
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	32x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	15x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	11x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	15x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	11x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	10x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	8x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	6x

RAM
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	17x
CM3B8G2C1600L11 2x8GBCorsairBench 56%, 507 samples	9x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 4x8GBCrucialBench 57%, 8,984 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $624

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16