Asus ROG MAXIMUS XI APEX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive236% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS XI APEX  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 25 '19 at 20:56
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$259
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 93.6
1-Core 150
2-Core 299
99% 181 Pts
4-Core 599
8-Core 1,158
104% 878 Pts
64-Core 1,060
66% 1,060 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 103%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Lighting 140
Reflection 127
Parallax 131
114% 132 fps
MRender 174
Gravity 129
Splatting 102
107% 135 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 109%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
402GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 863 620 619 606 606 605 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 2,007
Write 1,643
Mixed 708
SusWrite 653
278% 1,253 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 59.3
211% 77.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,114
DQ Write 1,166
DQ Mixed 1,034
807% 1,105 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 236%
Great: 254%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
222GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 423 479 484 485 484 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 482
Mixed 464
SusWrite 458
108% 478 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 61.7
210% 74.9 MB/s
DQ Read 284
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 355
255% 325 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 127%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
635GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 485 486 485 484 484 483 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 485
Mixed 466
SusWrite 485
110% 488 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 99.5
4K Mixed 59
196% 67.8 MB/s
DQ Read 283
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 354
254% 324 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 125%
Great: 133%
WDC WD10 EARS-00Y5B1 1TB
264GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 18 21 18 19 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
6% Terrible
Read 8.3
Write 42.8
Mixed 10
SusWrite 20.5
31% 20.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
7% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 6%
Great: 36%
WDC WD20 EZRZ-00Z5HB0 2TB
879GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 8.9 12 11 11 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 31.3
Write 48.5
Mixed 31.3
SusWrite 12.8
42% 31 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
90% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 53%
Freecom mHDD 1TB
895GB free, PID fca5
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 82 65 46 51 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Read 27.5
Write 24.2
Mixed 26
SusWrite 59.7
49% 34.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
32% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.7% Good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 19.9
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 25
SC Mixed 21.9
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 60.7
66% 60.7 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG MAXIMUS XI APEX Builds (Compare 166 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS XI APEX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $864
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback