Asus ROG MAXIMUS XI HERO (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 136%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive319% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS XI HERO (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190129
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 21 '19 at 15:47
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$188
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 97.5
1-Core 162
2-Core 320
106% 193 Pts
4-Core 629
8-Core 980
99% 805 Pts
64-Core 1,310
81% 1,310 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 107%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
125% Outstanding
Lighting 172
Reflection 195
Parallax 190
140% 186 fps
MRender 125
Gravity 178
Splatting 124
115% 142 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 125%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
402GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 935 652 645 648 653 652 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
319% Outstanding
Read 2,575
Write 2,314
Mixed 1,498
SusWrite 697
395% 1,771 MB/s
4K Read 70
4K Write 204
4K Mixed 99.3
341% 124 MB/s
DQ Read 1,592
DQ Write 1,470
DQ Mixed 1480
1,124% 1,514 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 319%
Great: 340%
Samsung 860 Evo 4TB-$380
2.5TB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 490 482 489 490 487 489 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 488
Mixed 469
SusWrite 488
110% 490 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 62
213% 78.1 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 355
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 133%
Great: 133%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$51
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 195 197 197 197 198 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 210
Mixed 105
SusWrite 196
128% 175 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
216% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 111%
Great: 112%
Samsung SSD 850 EVO 500G 500GB
256GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 43 43 43 43 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
79% Very good
Read 40
Write 42.7
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 43.1
58% 41.8 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 19.7
4K Mixed 16.2
1,273% 16.6 MB/s
DQ Read 14.3
DQ Write 20.2
DQ Mixed 16.7
1,308% 17.1 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 79%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$34
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
MC Read 37.7
MC Write 34.9
MC Mixed 26.6
94% 33.1 GB/s
SC Read 22.9
SC Write 37.3
SC Mixed 30.4
86% 30.2 GB/s
Latency 48.3
83% 48.3 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG MAXIMUS XI HERO (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 8,016 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS XI HERO (WI-FI) - $439

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $1,544
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback