Lenovo 80FY

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU, SSD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 8.1 is the second most recent version of Windows but it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemLenovo 80FY  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lancer 4A6
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140609
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 21 '19 at 04:14
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Celeron N2830
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
1-Core 28.4
2-Core 55.1
20% 41.8 Pts
4-Core 55.6
8-Core 41.3
7% 48.4 Pts
64-Core 56
4% 56 Pts
Poor: 7%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 14%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$18
275GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 12.01A12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 54 52 56 57 47 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
29.1% Poor
Read 47.4
Write 44.9
Mixed 37.8
SusWrite 53.5
34% 45.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 42%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 16GB-$24
10GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Read 22.2
Write 21.1
Mixed 17.7
SusWrite 19.1
27% 20 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 4.3
372% 5.07 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown V-GeN D3H4GS1600RL 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.2% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 5.9
15% 5.27 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 4.1
10% 3.5 GB/s
Latency 177
23% 177 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 28%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 80FY Builds (Compare 469 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop 21%
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80FY

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 14% - Very poor Total price: $22
The Best.
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $260Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $58
Intel Core i7-9700K $369Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback