PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 31.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P8H61-M (all builds) |
Memory | 8.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130918 |
Uptime | 1.5 Days |
Run Date | Jul 18 '19 at 06:15 |
Run Duration | 138 Seconds |
Run User | BRA-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-3330
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
|
70.4%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
EVGA(3842 2680) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
31.9%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 78 73 92 95 88 MB/s
|
60.2%
Good
|
|||
WDC WD50 00LPCX-24C6HT0 500GB
67GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 20 20 20 MB/s
|
13%
Very poor
|
|||
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
112GB free, PID 61b6
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 19 20 20 20 MB/s
|
11.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 9905471-006.A00LF 029E CMV8GX3M1A1333C9 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
|
39.1%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 34x |
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples | 32x |
Core i7-2600Intel $192Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 25x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 34x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 22x |
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 10x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $355 |