Asus E3 PRO GAMING V5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics58.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus E3 PRO GAMING V5  (all builds)
Memory20.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151123
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 13 '19 at 07:43
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
76.4% Very good
Memory 81.9
1-Core 102
2-Core 215
75% 133 Pts
4-Core 407
8-Core 424
55% 416 Pts
64-Core 431
27% 431 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Lighting 73.1
Reflection 74.1
Parallax 64.1
60% 70.4 fps
MRender 69
Gravity 67.6
Splatting 69.2
56% 68.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNH512GCST 512GB
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N103
SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Read 450
Write 217
Mixed 351
SusWrite 284
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 91.7
4K Mixed 42.4
128% 50.3 MB/s
DQ Read 343
DQ Write 245
DQ Mixed 311
228% 300 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 106%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$16
27GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 41 19 19 18 17 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 136
Write 79.7
Mixed 91.7
SusWrite 30.3
104% 84.4 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 2.8
182% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 38%
WDC WD10 SPCX-24HWST1 1TB
734GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 62 57 64 59 62 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.4% Below average
Read 104
Write 105
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 60.4
107% 81.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 43%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00MMMB0 3TB
325GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 69 71 75 73 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 78.8
Write 79.7
Mixed 62.7
SusWrite 72.3
99% 73.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
68% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 51%
Hitachi HTS547575A9E384 750GB
440GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 62 57 64 59 61 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.7% Poor
Read 63.2
Write 41.8
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 60.3
60% 46.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 26%
ST3000DM 008-2DM166 3TB
610GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 69 71 75 73 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 169
Write 127
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 72.3
140% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905678-173.A00G Apacer 78.C1GM3.C7Z0B 9905678-173.A00G 24GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
62.8% Good
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 21
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 22.5
SC Mixed 18.6
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical E3 PRO GAMING V5 Builds (Compare 258 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus E3 PRO GAMING V5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $169
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback