PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 58.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 89.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus E3 PRO GAMING V5 (all builds) |
Memory | 20.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20151123 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jul 13 '19 at 07:43 |
Run Duration | 206 Seconds |
Run User | MYS-User |
Background CPU | 15% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
76.4%
Very good
|
75% 133 Pts
|
55% 416 Pts
|
27% 431 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 431.36
|
58.4%
Above average
|
60% 70.4 fps
|
56% 68.6 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Toshiba THNSNH512GCST 512GB
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N103
SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s
|
89.1%
Excellent
|
73% 326 MB/s
|
128% 50.3 MB/s
|
228% 300 MB/s
|
![]() SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$16
27GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 41 19 19 18 17 MB/s
|
33.7%
Below average
|
104% 84.4 MB/s
|
182% 3.27 MB/s
|
|
![]() WDC WD10 SPCX-24HWST1 1TB
734GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 62 57 64 59 62 MB/s
|
34.4%
Below average
|
107% 81.8 MB/s
|
100% 1.13 MB/s
|
|
![]() WDC WD30 EZRX-00MMMB0 3TB
325GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 69 71 75 73 74 MB/s
|
31.4%
Below average
|
99% 73.4 MB/s
|
68% 0.93 MB/s
|
|
![]() Hitachi HTS547575A9E384 750GB
440GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 62 57 64 59 61 MB/s
|
23.7%
Poor
|
60% 46.5 MB/s
|
29% 0.43 MB/s
|
|
![]() ST3000DM 008-2DM166 3TB
610GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 69 71 75 73 74 MB/s
|
45.7%
Average
|
140% 112 MB/s
|
88% 1.07 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
62.8%
Good
|
64% 22.3 GB/s
|
52% 18.2 GB/s
|
52% 77.1 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Xeon E3-1230 v5IntelBench 77%, 2,254 samples | 78x |
Core i7-6700KIntel $170Bench 81%, 588,978 samples | 35x |
Xeon E3-1240 v5IntelBench 77%, 2,434 samples | 24x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 24x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 21x |
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 18x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $169 |