Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive71% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190702
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 12 '19 at 15:35
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 37%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Memory 76.2
1-Core 152
2-Core 307
95% 179 Pts
4-Core 598
8-Core 1,150
104% 874 Pts
64-Core 1,430
88% 1,430 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$266
MSI(1462 3810) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.10.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Lighting 139
Reflection 117
Parallax 257
113% 171 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 134
Splatting 161
115% 137 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 111%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNH512GCST 512GB
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HTLAN103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 169 109 106 95 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
71% Very good
Read 428
Write 168
Mixed 358
SusWrite 124
60% 270 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 70
4K Mixed 41.5
122% 44.3 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 100
DQ Mixed 153
116% 159 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71%
Great: 106%
Hitachi Travelstar 5K750 750GB-$52
164GB free
Firmware: JE4OA60A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 60 61 61 62 62 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 66
Write 67.2
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 60.1
39% 53.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
73% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 53%
WDC WD10 SPCX-24HWST1 1TB
727GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 99 102 98 100 96 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.7% Average
Read 106
Write 104
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 98.4
122% 91.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 43%
BUFFALO HD-PNFU3 2TB
378GB free, PID 0251
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 74 77 76 77 76 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 99
Write 101
Mixed 33.2
SusWrite 76.2
101% 77.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 36%
Great: 50%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00MMMB0 3TB
90GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 116 116 116 116 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 118
Write 116
Mixed 76.8
SusWrite 116
144% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
75% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 51%
ST3000DM 008-2DM166 3TB
155GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 99 101 99 97 107 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 201
Write 138
Mixed 86.3
SusWrite 100
164% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905678-173.A00G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.2% Very good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 27.9
71% 25 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 27.5
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 87.9
46% 87.9 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,636 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 111% - Outstanding Total price: $720
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback