PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 46.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 31.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER (all builds) |
Memory | 15.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140716 |
Uptime | 4.2 Days |
Run Date | Jun 23 '19 at 13:13 |
Run Duration | 202 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 97% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-4690K-$58
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
|
54.3%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Palit(1569 13C2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1442 MHz, MLim: 1852 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
46.1%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$88
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 30 27 26 27 26 MB/s
|
31.3%
Below average
|
|||
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
55GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 270 301 312 307 311 MB/s
|
56.5%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38
102GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 107 82 114 111 108 MB/s
|
67.8%
Good
|
|||
Samsung HN-M750MBB 750GB-$58
516GB free
Firmware: 2AR10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 88 88 88 89 89 MB/s
|
48.7%
Average
|
|||
Seagate Momentus XT 7200 RPM 2.5" 750GB-$55
396GB free
Firmware: SM12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 93 97 98 98 97 MB/s
|
50%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
75GB free
Firmware: SC23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 104 101 101 101 MB/s
|
61.9%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples | 1,682x |
Core i5-4690KIntel $58Bench 70%, 229,359 samples | 475x |
Core i7-4790Intel $115Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 232x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 427x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $170Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 240x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 164x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Above average | Total price: $930 |