MSI A320M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7B07)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive42.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B07
MotherboardMSI A320M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7B07)  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190515
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateJun 11 '19 at 13:34
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Memory 79.4
1-Core 126
2-Core 251
84% 152 Pts
4-Core 495
8-Core 882
83% 688 Pts
64-Core 1310
81% 1310 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Zotac(19DA 4511) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 122
Parallax 118
101% 121 fps
MRender 176
Gravity 128
Splatting 101
107% 135 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 102%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$41
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 50 2.8 2.2 24 3.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 450
Write 373
Mixed 224
SusWrite 52.7
61% 275 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 23.2
4K Mixed 13.7
64% 19.8 MB/s
DQ Read 51.4
DQ Write 69.9
DQ Mixed 26.9
30% 49.4 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
753GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 171 170 171 167 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 159
Mixed 106
SusWrite 169
111% 151 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
232% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 109%
WD easystore 25FA 4TB
3TB free, PID 25fa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 89 87 87 85 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
38% Below average
Read 104
Write 86.7
Mixed 61.5
SusWrite 86.2
111% 84.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.2
54% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 38%
Great: 63%
Memorex Mini TravelDrive 0GB
0GB free, PID 0020
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
4.18% Terrible
Read 12.2
Write 2.2
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 2.5
6% 5.27 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
28% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.18%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
83.6% Excellent
MC Read 34.1
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 29
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 25.2
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7B07) Builds (Compare 453 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI A320M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7B07)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $266
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback