bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics36.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardParallels Parallels Virtual Platform
Memory0.5 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display5120 x 2594 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190312
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 10 '19 at 16:56
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$170
CPU Socket #0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Memory 70.8
1-Core 110
2-Core 216
73% 133 Pts
4-Core 235
8-Core 235
31% 235 Pts
64-Core 229
14% 229 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Parallels Display Adapter (WDDM)
ParallelsVM(1AB8 0400) 1,013MB
Driver: prl_umdd.dll Ver. 14.1.45485.0
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Lighting 47.3
Reflection 49.8
Parallax 40
38% 45.7 fps
MRender 24.8
Gravity 57.7
Splatting 33.1
31% 38.6 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Harddisk SSD 275GB
234GB free (System drive)
Firmware: F.H0AXX0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 67 58 83 87 88 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 38% Great: 57%
TOSHIBA MK6475GSX 640GB
448GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 21 22 24 22 22 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
9.21% Terrible
Read 9.5
Write 9.7
Mixed 11.2
SusWrite 21.6
19% 13 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.3
45% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.21%
Great: 15%
WDC WD10 EZEX-08WN4A0 1TB
1GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 3.9 3.2 5.6 4.2 5.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
3.12% Terrible
Read 10
Write 3
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 4.3
6% 5.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
19% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 3.12%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 8 slots used
2GB DIMM DRAM 667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
61.1% Good
MC Read 19
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 20.4
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 14
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 99.5
40% 99.5 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,525 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback