Gigabyte GA-H61M-D2-B3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H61M-D2-B3  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120327
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateSep 23 '16 at 01:05
Run Duration804 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 89.6
1-Core 92
2-Core 181
71% 121 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 246
39% 279 Pts
64-Core 221
14% 221 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Desktop V1 1.1 GHz)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4101
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
1.9% Terrible
Lighting 2.07
Reflection 3.19
Parallax 0.69
2% 1.98 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 1.13
Splatting 3.87
2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.9%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
364GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.1% Average
Read 179
Write 160
Mixed 152
36% 164 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 32
4K Mixed 16.8
78% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 31.8
DQ Write 49.5
DQ Mixed 16.9
20% 32.8 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
48GB free
Firmware: CC34 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 82.3
Write 79.5
Mixed 36.7
49% 66.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 1.32
4K Mixed 0.38
91% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
37GB free
Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 70.2
Write 70.4
Mixed 23.2
40% 54.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.59
4K Mixed 0.41
101% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 70%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 2TB
1.5TB free, PID ab21
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 102
Write 121
Mixed 65
122% 96.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.77
4K Mixed 0.3
73% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 53%
Rockbox SD Card Slot 64GB
41GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
3.96% Terrible
Read 6.97
Write 3.69
Mixed 4.51
6% 5.06 MB/s
4K Read 2.29
4K Write 0.52
4K Mixed 0.78
53% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.96%
Great: 8%
Corsair Flash Survivor USB 3.0 16GB-$48
15GB free, PID 1a04
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 37.9
Write 17.8
Mixed 28.1
33% 27.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.92
4K Write 0.34
4K Mixed 0.02
27% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 36%
Rockbox Internal Storage 8GB
7GB free, PID null
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
4.11% Terrible
Read 7.12
Write 2.4
Mixed 1.77
4% 3.76 MB/s
4K Read 2.76
4K Write 0.62
4K Mixed 1.07
68% 1.48 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.11%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
50.5% Above average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 16.2
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 16.4
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H61M-D2-B3 Builds (Compare 402 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H61M-D2-B3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $77
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback