Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.9%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics30% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B75M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131023
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 31 '18 at 20:25
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i3-3220-$50
Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-3220 CPU @ 3.30GHz, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
38.9% Below average
1-Core 90.3
2-Core 163
61% 127 Pts
4-Core 233
8-Core 234
32% 233 Pts
64-Core 238
16% 238 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
30% Poor
Lighting 78.1
Reflection 64.2
Parallax 104
27% 82.1 fps
MRender 72.2
Gravity 90.4
Splatting 59.5
32% 74 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30%
Great: 30%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$86
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.4% Above average
Read 267
Write 214
Mixed 220
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 35.4
4K Mixed 17
81% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 30.3
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 16.8
30% 56.8 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
14GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 77.8
Write 89.7
Mixed 61.6
57% 76.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 1.84
4K Mixed 0.2
72% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 62%
Corsair Flash Survivor USB 3.0 16GB-$48
3GB free, PID 1a04
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
9.13% Terrible
Read 31.8
Write 20.2
Mixed 17.8
27% 23.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.02
4K Write 0.04
4K Mixed 0.02
2% 0.02 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.13%
Great: 36%
Kingston DataTraveler Ultimate USB 3.0 16GB-$44
1GB free, PID 1656
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Read 22.6
Write 19.5
Mixed 17.5
25% 19.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.01
4K Write 0.52
4K Mixed 0.28
42% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
53.3% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.8
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 17.1
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 62.4
64% 62.4 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 63%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical GA-B75M-D3H Builds (Compare 8,989 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3H - $80

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $432
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $198Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
Intel Core i5-9600K $230Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $750Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $195
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $695SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback