PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 1.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus P5B (all builds) |
Memory | 2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20090309 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | May 25 '19 at 03:51 |
Run Duration | 336 Seconds |
Run User | POL-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
45.7%
Average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce 8500 GT
Gigabyte(1458 344C) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 340.52
|
1.33%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 103 110 118 110 100 MB/s
|
72.6%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38
33GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 100 103 105 110 113 MB/s
|
72.8%
Very good
|
|||
35.5%
Below average
|
||||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38
9GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 98 94 97 97 89 MB/s
|
48.8%
Average
|
|||
Toshiba P300 3TB-$99
11GB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 125 123 132 134 132 MB/s
|
86.6%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate Desktop 1TB
30GB free, PID 3300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 23 24 24 25 24 MB/s
|
13.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Generic Flash Disk 32GB
12GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 5.2 4.4 4.7 4.4 4.7 MB/s
|
||||
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
28GB free, PID 331a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 13 12 13 13 14 MB/s
|
29.3%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate Expansion 1TB
110GB free, PID 2312
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 14 12 13 13 13 MB/s
|
17.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate Expansion 1TB
13GB free, PID 2322
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 13 11 12 13 14 MB/s
|
15%
Very poor
|
|||
LaCie P9223 2TB
7GB free, PID 1070
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 11 12 12 13 MB/s
|
14.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Toshiba External USB 3.0 500GB
9GB free, PID a007
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 13 12 12 13 12 MB/s
|
13.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 6TB
1.5TB free, PID ab38
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 13 12 12 13 13 MB/s
|
28%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 6TB
2TB free, PID ab38
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 13 12 12 13 13 MB/s
|
25.3%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM SDRAM
|
19.7%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 27x |
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 19x |
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 14x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 17x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 10x |
GeForce GT 220NvidiaBench 2%, 19,671 samples | 8x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 51% - Above average | Total price: $185 |