Aleksey E5 VER: 3.2S1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics39.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAleksey E5 VER: 3.2S1  (all builds)
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180701
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 20 '19 at 17:06
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2-$635
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Memory 91.5
1-Core 96.2
2-Core 193
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 419
8-Core 680
67% 550 Pts
64-Core 811
50% 811 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1250 MHz, MLim: 1650 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.4.1
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.1% Below average
Lighting 46.5
Reflection 62.6
Parallax 60.1
38% 56.4 fps
MRender 56.7
Gravity 48.1
Splatting 48
41% 50.9 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
763GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 110 69 86 82 112 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 137
Write 110
Mixed 32
SusWrite 93.2
67% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.4
101% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 107%
Hitachi HTS543232A7A384 320GB-$40
226GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 33
Write 21
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 14.8
17% 23.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
97% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 46%
WDC WD10 03FBYZ-010FB0 1TB
17GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 19 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
15% Very poor
Read 32
Write 24.5
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 18.3
32% 24.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
99% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70QB0- 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 45.7
MC Write 45.1
MC Mixed 42.9
127% 44.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 12.8
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 112%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical E5 VER: 3.2S1 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Aleksey E5 VER: 3.2S1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $760
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback