Samsung R780

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemSamsung R780  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG R780
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100705
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 19 '19 at 16:43
Run Duration288 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 77%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7 M 640
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Memory 53.4
1-Core 47.7
2-Core 76.3
38% 59.1 Pts
4-Core 133
8-Core 151
19% 142 Pts
64-Core 145
10% 145 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 330M
Sanyo(144D C06A) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
2.44% Terrible
Lighting 8.8
Reflection 10.8
Parallax 3
2% 7.53 fps
MRender 12.8
Gravity 7
Splatting 8.5
2% 9.43 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.44%
Great: 2%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$122
733GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 101 97 145 180 186 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.5% Average
Read 161
Write 49.8
Mixed 199
SusWrite 134
30% 136 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 31.2
4K Mixed 14.9
78% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 171
124% 162 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$440
19GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 59 54 54 51 51 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.9% Below average
Read 179
Write 77.5
Mixed 110
SusWrite 56.5
23% 106 MB/s
4K Read 13.2
4K Write 26
4K Mixed 12.7
50% 17.3 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 86.6
DQ Mixed 127
97% 133 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 127%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 246GB
215GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 15 12 13 13 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 23.6
Write 15
Mixed 16.7
SusWrite 12.9
22% 17 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
90% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11%
Great: 36%
Single Flash Reader 256GB
158GB free, PID 6335
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.7 1.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
0.77% Terrible
Read 3.2
Write 1.7
Mixed 2.7
SusWrite 1.4
3% 2.25 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.77%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
18.6% Very poor
MC Read 6.4
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 8
20% 6.83 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 2.1
SC Mixed 2.6
7% 2.57 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical R780 Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung R780

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 31% - Below average Total price: $67
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $43
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $290Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $475Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $66SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback