Dell XPS 8300

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive58.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemDell XPS 8300  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0Y2MRG
Memory3.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111017
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMay 19 '19 at 03:06
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 97%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$172
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
26.6% Poor
Memory 28.7
1-Core 35
2-Core 94.8
28% 52.8 Pts
4-Core 130
8-Core 451
31% 290 Pts
64-Core 457
28% 457 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 74%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$229
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 256 261 262 253 261 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 319
Write 264
Mixed 198
SusWrite 260
58% 260 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 30.3
4K Mixed 17.4
61% 21 MB/s
DQ Read 314
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 159
143% 220 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 133%
PNY CS1311 480GB-$31
161GB free
Firmware: CS131122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 161 164 129 132 124 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41% Average
Read 172
Write 149
Mixed 139
SusWrite 146
34% 151 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 25.2
4K Mixed 15.7
56% 18.7 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 121
105% 157 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 41%
Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88
121GB free
Firmware: CC4G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 69 72 70 70 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 103
Write 116
Mixed 53.3
SusWrite 69.8
63% 85.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 70%
HPT DISK 0_0 8TB
627GB free
Firmware: 4.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 71 70 70 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 142
Write 67
Mixed 58
SusWrite 69.2
62% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 134%
HPT DISK 0_1 8TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 4.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 65 65 66 64 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 122
Write 72.1
Mixed 57.4
SusWrite 65
58% 79.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-007.A00LF 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
33.7% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 14
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 4.5
12% 4.07 GB/s
Latency 263
15% 263 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XPS 8300 Builds (Compare 1,749 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Dell XPS 8300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $311
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback