Gigabyte GA-B550 AORUS ELITE V2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 129%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B550 AORUS ELITE V2  (all builds)
Memory22.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200918
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateNov 06 '22 at 13:14
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$164
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Memory 78.4
1-Core 179
2-Core 354
107% 204 Pts
4-Core 648
8-Core 1129
107% 888 Pts
64-Core 1532
95% 1532 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 5000
Dell(1028 129F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 517.40
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
134% Outstanding
Lighting 180
Reflection 177
Parallax 184
147% 180 fps
MRender 188
Gravity 157
Splatting 146
132% 164 fps
Poor: 122%
This bench: 134%
Great: 137%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 250GB
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 258 256 258 258 213 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Amd-raid Array 1 2TB
461GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 74 74 75 76 73 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 51% Great: 232%
HPT DISK 0_0 8TB
1TB free
Firmware: 4.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 132 129 130 123 133 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 91.6
Write 90
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 128
70% 94.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
265% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.1% Good
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 26
66% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 24
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 21.7
60% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 83.6
48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B550 AORUS ELITE V2 Builds (Compare 6,938 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 113%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550 AORUS ELITE V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $579
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback