HP Pavilion Laptop 15-cw0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion Laptop 15-cw0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84E7
Memory7.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181105
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 08 '19 at 21:51
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Memory 38.1
1-Core 56.8
2-Core 123
40% 72.7 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 389
36% 303 Pts
64-Core 414
26% 414 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
HP(103C 84E7) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
4.6% Terrible
Lighting 5.57
Reflection 5.85
Parallax 7.09
4% 6.17 fps
MRender 4.76
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 6.87
5% 5.61 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 4.6%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV8-8E128-HP 128GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V881
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 125 135 140 141 141 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 412
Write 140
Mixed 176
SusWrite 136
48% 216 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 31.9
4K Mixed 17.6
60% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 101
86% 128 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 95%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: RSM7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 129 133 134 134 135 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 118
Write 119
Mixed 55.3
SusWrite 132
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
202% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4S9S1ME-4 Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 12GB
2666, 2666 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
24.9% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 11
25% 8.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 8.8
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 212
19% 212 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Laptop 15-cw0xxx Builds (Compare 285 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Laptop 15-cw0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback