HP Pavilion Laptop 15-cw0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics10.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive82.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion Laptop 15-cw0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84E7
Memory8.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190219
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 27 '19 at 06:42
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
40.3% Average
Memory 70.5
1-Core 71.8
2-Core 126
54% 89.4 Pts
4-Core 55
8-Core 476
26% 265 Pts
64-Core 496
31% 496 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
HP(103C 84E7) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Lighting 12.5
Reflection 13.2
Parallax 16
10% 13.9 fps
MRender 11.9
Gravity 11.8
Splatting 15.7
11% 13.1 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV8-8E128-HP 128GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V881
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 111 139 142 141 142 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Read 497
Write 394
Mixed 393
SusWrite 148
80% 358 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 70.9
4K Mixed 41.7
143% 49 MB/s
DQ Read 229
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 111
111% 179 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 95%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
928GB free
Firmware: JU004C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 135 138 139 140 138 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 139
Write 125
Mixed 57.8
SusWrite 138
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 6.7
4K Mixed 0.6
245% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4S9S1ME-4 Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 12GB
2666, 2666 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
69.9% Good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 25.3
MC Mixed 23
71% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 22.1
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Laptop 15-cw0xxx Builds (Compare 285 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Laptop 15-cw0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback