Today's hottest deals

HP 285 G2 MT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.49% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 285 G2 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B60
Memory2.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160122
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateMay 07 '19 at 12:23
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User GEO-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8 PRO-7600B R7, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
43.2% Average
Memory 55.3
1-Core 62.3
2-Core 117
46% 78.2 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 196
25% 187 Pts
64-Core 181
11% 181 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
HP(103C 2B60) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
5.49% Terrible
Lighting 6.63
Reflection 6.77
Parallax 9.69
5% 7.7 fps
MRender 5.71
Gravity 6.67
Splatting 7.87
6% 6.75 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.49%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
414GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 76 94 74 106 76 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 115
Write 86
Mixed 61.5
SusWrite 84.3
64% 86.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
156% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-YK0 6GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.3% Poor
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 9.1
26% 9.23 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 8.2
20% 7.1 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 285 G2 MT Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP 285 G2 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback