Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 99% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 69% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	214% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	38.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180314
Uptime	19.2 Days
Run Date	May 04 '19 at 18:39
Run Duration	383 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	62%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$148 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	74.5% Very good	Memory 91.6 1-Core 105 2-Core 188 76% 128 Pts	4-Core 337 8-Core 316 44% 327 Pts	64-Core 33.4 2% 33.4 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85EA) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.39 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	131% Outstanding	Lighting 183 Reflection 199 Parallax 197 149% 193 fps	MRender 128 Gravity 183 Splatting 124 117% 145 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 131% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$88 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 41GB free Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,054 Write 1,449 Mixed 563 297% 1355 MB/s	4K Read 43 4K Write 177 4K Mixed 58.5 234% 92.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,082 DQ Write 1,226 DQ Mixed 732 668% 1,013 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$88 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 91GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 595 258 254 257 254 253 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	214% Outstanding	Read 1,978 Write 1,281 Mixed 490 SusWrite 312 223% 1,015 MB/s	4K Read 43.3 4K Write 167 4K Mixed 54.5 224% 88.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,079 DQ Write 1,090 DQ Mixed 776 668% 981 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 214% Great: 236%
H/W DISK 4 4TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 58GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 32 30 28 29 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	28.8% Poor	Read 100 Write 132 Mixed 68.5 SusWrite 29.2 109% 82.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 122% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 31%
H/W DISK 4 4TB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 26GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 28 16 20 12 17 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	24.9% Poor	Read 103 Write 119 Mixed 58.2 SusWrite 18.2 96% 74.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 24.9% Great: 69%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB 18,040 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 401GB free, PID 25a2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 41 39 41 40 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	20.9% Poor	Read 41 Write 40 Mixed 32.8 SusWrite 40 52% 38.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 20.9% Great: 61%
H/W DISK 3 3TB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 10GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 68 79 81 88 80 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	41% Average	Read 121 Write 121 Mixed 74.5 SusWrite 78.7 130% 98.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 50%
H/W DISK 1 4TB 217GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 87 100 91 88 88 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	42.9% Average	Read 122 Write 162 Mixed 69.7 SusWrite 89.6 149% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 90% 1.03 MB/s

H/W DISK 2 4TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 80GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 32 30 28 29 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	30.9% Below average	Read 126 Write 127 Mixed 57.2 SusWrite 29.3 107% 84.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 93% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 44%
H/W DISK 3 3TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 213GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 32 30 28 29 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	32.7% Below average	Read 127 Write 122 Mixed 71.5 SusWrite 29.3 110% 87.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 122% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 33%
H/W DISK 1 3TB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 96 95 98 98 98 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	46.9% Average	Read 116 Write 119 Mixed 79.8 SusWrite 97.1 138% 103 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 133% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 60%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 239GB free, PID 1042 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 31 32 32 32 31 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	17.4% Very poor	Read 36.2 Write 34.5 Mixed 24.8 SusWrite 31.4 42% 31.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 83% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 17.4% Great: 43%
Seagate Desktop 2TB 3,779 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2GB free, PID 3300 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 39 Write 41 Mixed 31 47% 37 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 56% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 19%
H/W DISK 2 3TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 228GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 163 164 165 166 165 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	65.9% Good	Read 148 Write 143 Mixed 88.2 SusWrite 165 184% 136 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 130% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 72%
WD My Book 1230 3TB 7,778 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 4GB free, PID 1230 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 81 Write 82.2 Mixed 66 97% 76.4 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 102% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS16G4D240FSC.16FBD 4x16GB 271 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	76.1% Very good	MC Read 28.5 MC Write 30.9 MC Mixed 25.7 81% 28.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 20.7 SC Mixed 14.4 46% 16 GB/s	Latency 64.9 62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 135%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical STRIX Z270F GAMING Builds (Compare 6,398 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 89%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 76%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING - $439

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $148Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	4,107x
Core i5-7600KIntel $135Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	807x
Core i7-7700Intel $113Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	387x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	967x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	821x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	810x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	290x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	283x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $99Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	206x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	372x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	304x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $48Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	144x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 102% - Outstanding

Total price: $909

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155	Nvidia RTX 4060 $299	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350