Asus A88XM-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics27.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus A88XM-A  (all builds)
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150424
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateApr 30 '19 at 10:38
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-7400K APU (2014 D.Ka)
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
42.7% Average
Memory 73.8
1-Core 34.5
2-Core 65.7
40% 58 Pts
4-Core 68
8-Core 87.9
10% 77.9 Pts
64-Core 87.4
5% 87.4 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Gigabyte(1458 3765) 2GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
27.4% Poor
Lighting 33.7
Reflection 24.4
Parallax 30.4
27% 29.5 fps
MRender 37.6
Gravity 32.4
Splatting 31.4
27% 33.8 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
35GB free
Firmware: 541A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 89 94 94 91 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 130
Write 104
Mixed 122
SusWrite 92
25% 112 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 61.3
4K Mixed 16.8
82% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 100
79% 109 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 73%
WD WD2500YD-01NVB1 251GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 22 16 16 25 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Read 34.5
Write 35.5
Mixed 26
SusWrite 22
22% 29.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 35%
General UDisk 67GB
46GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 7.6 6.1 8.1 7.2 7.5 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
5.6% Terrible
Read 19.5
Write 2.7
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 7.1
9% 8.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
19% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.6%
Great: 31%
USB DISK 3.0 32GB
3GB free, PID 5500
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 4.4 6 5 5.9 7.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
9.62% Terrible
Read 33
Write 16
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 5.5
16% 14.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.3
89% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.62%
Great: 37%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 2GB
1GB free, PID 0028
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 5.3 4.9 5.7 5.4 5.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
5.27% Terrible
Read 16.8
Write 2.3
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 5.2
8% 7.45 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
27% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.27%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD34G1600K 4GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.6% Poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 7.1
20% 6.87 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 6.2
18% 6.17 GB/s
Latency 92.8
43% 92.8 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A88XM-A Builds (Compare 378 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A88XM-A - $62

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $178
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback