Asus F1A75-M LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.21% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive70.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus F1A75-M LE  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140527
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '20 at 22:51
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-3650 APU
FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Memory 79.1
1-Core 39.6
2-Core 81
44% 66.6 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 160
21% 160 Pts
64-Core 160
10% 160 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670
Sapphire(174B E194) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
7.21% Terrible
Lighting 9.2
Reflection 9
Parallax 7.19
8% 8.46 fps
MRender 8.76
Gravity 6.43
Splatting 8.96
7% 8.05 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.21%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
210GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 357 289 291 291 292 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 318
Write 367
Mixed 306
SusWrite 310
73% 325 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 54.2
4K Mixed 33.5
114% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 41.7
DQ Write 94
DQ Mixed 53.8
45% 63.2 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$30
118GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 75 76 76 72 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 91.6
Write 87.7
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 74.3
56% 76.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD34G1600K 4GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
41.2% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 13.3
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 9.6
23% 8 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F1A75-M LE Builds (Compare 48 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A75-M LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $35
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback