ADD TO PC
BUILD

Advantech ASMB-813

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Advantech ASMB-813 (all builds)
Motherboard	Advantech ASMB-813
Memory	14.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170301
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 25 '19 at 05:49
Run Duration	119 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 3,243 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	81.1% Excellent	Memory 83.1 1-Core 118 2-Core 243 82% 148 Pts	4-Core 440 8-Core 538 63% 489 Pts	64-Core 545 34% 545 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 81.1% Great: 84%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 1 Volume 950GB 636 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 863GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 195 146 95 99 156 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	97.5% Outstanding	Read 193 Write 156 Mixed 78.9 SusWrite 147 105% 144 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 97.5% Great: 142%
USB DISK 3.0 16GB 1,966 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 15GB free, PID 5500 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 23 22 22 23 18 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	14.2% Very poor	Read 40.8 Write 19.5 Mixed 10.3 SusWrite 21.5 27% 23 MB/s	4K Read 11.3 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 1 86% 4.2 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown AQD-D4U16N24-SE 1x16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1 of 24 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	42.2% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 13.1 MC Mixed 12.7 40% 14.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 12.8 SC Mixed 14.3 39% 13.6 GB/s	Latency 75 53% 75 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback