PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 54.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 46.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus SABERTOOTH X58 (all builds) |
Memory | 15.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110301 |
Uptime | 3.7 Days |
Run Date | Apr 16 '19 at 13:58 |
Run Duration | 254 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 52% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5520
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
|
55.4%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
EVGA(3842 4996) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1582 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 419.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
54.8%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
279GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 167 183 163 64 55 MB/s
|
46.4%
Average
|
|||
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
114GB free
Firmware: M0C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 106 110 115 104 92 MB/s
|
48.6%
Average
|
|||
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
227GB free
Firmware: M0C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 107 110 115 116 100 MB/s
|
49.1%
Average
|
|||
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
212GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 64 70 63 64 63 MB/s
|
39.9%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
946GB free
Firmware: CC4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 64 70 63 64 63 MB/s
|
21.3%
Poor
|
|||
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power 5TB
590GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
|
12%
Very poor
|
|||
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power 4TB
475GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
|
9.97%
Terrible
|
|||
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power 4TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
|
10.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM
|
38.3%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples | 605x |
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples | 292x |
Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples | 88x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 116x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 88x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 80x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 59% - Above average | Total price: $380 |