Gigabyte GA-H77-D3H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics32.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H77-D3H  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120531
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateSep 03 '16 at 20:02
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Memory 95.1
1-Core 103
2-Core 204
78% 134 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 512
57% 446 Pts
64-Core 512
32% 512 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
Zotac(19DA 1255) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7270
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Lighting 38.9
Reflection 38
Parallax 49
32% 42 fps
MRender 50.4
Gravity 43.6
Splatting 35.3
34% 43.1 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$66
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 70
Write 75.9
Mixed 69.7
54% 71.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.48
4K Mixed 0.21
66% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 67%
TrekStor DS pocket capa 1TB
285GB free, PID 004a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 38.1
Write 38
Mixed 37.5
49% 37.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.22
29% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-442.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
60.9% Good
MC Read 22
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 19.3
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 18.9
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 56.8
70% 56.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H77-D3H Builds (Compare 410 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H77-D3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $436
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback