bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics34.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
System
MotherboardIntel DH77KC
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130513
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 03 '16 at 10:22
Run Duration313 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 91.8
1-Core 106
2-Core 204
78% 134 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 513
56% 445 Pts
64-Core 516
32% 516 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 36D2) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7270
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
34.8% Below average
Lighting 45.3
Reflection 43.8
Parallax 38.9
37% 42.6 fps
MRender 38.5
Gravity 39.8
Splatting 35.1
31% 37.8 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
236GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 376
Mixed 412
96% 432 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 54
4K Mixed 41.7
132% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 96
103% 174 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 134%
WD VelociRaptor 1TB-$268
911GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.06A00 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 228
Write 184
Mixed 180
148% 197 MB/s
4K Read 1.82
4K Write 4.25
4K Mixed 0.47
206% 2.18 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 119%
Great: 117%
WD Black 4TB (2012)-$323
153GB free
Firmware: 01.01L01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 109
Write 93.3
Mixed 94.5
74% 99 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 2.42
4K Mixed 0.28
91% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 93%
ST8000AS 0002-1NA17Z 8TB
3.5TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 96.9
Write 99.5
Mixed 64.7
109% 87 MB/s
4K Read 1.19
4K Write 9.88
4K Mixed 0.58
360% 3.88 MB/s
DQ Read 1.39
DQ Write 11.2
DQ Mixed 0.55
404% 4.37 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 87%
WD My Passport 083C 2TB
664GB free, PID 083c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
20.3% Poor
Read 81
Write 34.7
Mixed 32.4
54% 49.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 0.29
4K Mixed 0.2
19% 0.34 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 38%
WD My Passport 0741 2TB
513GB free, PID 0741
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 78.8
Write 82.6
Mixed 71.6
100% 77.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 0.15
58% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 44%
WDC WD40 EURX-64WRWY0 4TB
303GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 115
Write 118
Mixed 77.4
130% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.37
4K Mixed 0.24
57% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 47%
Corsair Slider 3.0 124GB
115GB free, PID 1a06, Corsair Voyager Slider 128GB USB3
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
23.8% Poor
Read 129
Write 15.6
Mixed 31.3
53% 58.6 MB/s
4K Read 7.18
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.07
30% 2.42 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600 CL9 Series 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
59.5% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 19.1
59% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 18.8
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,514 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback