Today's hottest deals

Asus P6T DELUXE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.27% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P6T DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090902
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJan 10 '22 at 09:42
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 940-$150
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
61.3% Good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 70.7
2-Core 139
60% 97.7 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 332
34% 273 Pts
64-Core 314
19% 314 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 285
XFX(1682 2490) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
9.27% Terrible
Lighting 13.1
Reflection 14
Parallax 6.6
11% 11.2 fps
MRender 10.6
Gravity 11
Splatting 4.1
7% 8.57 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.27%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$66
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 96 100 88 102 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 56.5
Write 169
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 94.8
63% 87.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 1.9
361% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 110%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
127GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 84 84 84 85 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 59.5
Write 29.7
Mixed 42.6
SusWrite 83.8
40% 53.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
180% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 62%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
421GB free
Firmware: 1AJ100E4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 117 115 113 116 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 77.8
Write 34.2
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 115
52% 70.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
211% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 75%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
42GB free
Firmware: 1AC01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 104 101 84 110 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 106
Write 50.4
Mixed 62.1
SusWrite 102
59% 80 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
196% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 62%
WD VelociRaptor 1TB-$268
65GB free
Firmware: 04.06A00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 106 101 85 102 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 132
Write 130
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 101
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x2GB
6 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
37.2% Below average
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 15
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 11.7
26% 9.1 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6T DELUXE Builds (Compare 435 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P6T DELUXE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $375
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback