Asrock H97 Anniversary

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics58% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock H97 Anniversary  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150723
Uptime3.4 Days
Run DateAug 31 '16 at 00:04
Run Duration503 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690-$51
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Memory 88.2
1-Core 104
2-Core 209
77% 134 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 416
55% 414 Pts
64-Core 404
25% 404 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325
PowerColor(148C 2358) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.300.2511.1001
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
58% Above average
Lighting 71.8
Reflection 64.1
Parallax 85.4
58% 73.8 fps
MRender 63.5
Gravity 57.9
Splatting 82.6
57% 68 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 58%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
INTENSO 128GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8FM06.7 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 498
Write 329
Mixed 391
90% 406 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 96.5
4K Mixed 8.64
107% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 30.2
DQ Write 211
DQ Mixed 8.45
40% 83.2 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 91%
SanDisk Z400s 128GB-$109
20GB free
Firmware: Z2333000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 499
Write 178
Mixed 259
68% 312 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 3.93
105% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 27.7
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 14.8
28% 53 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 71%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
541GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 145
Mixed 132
113% 151 MB/s
4K Read 1.13
4K Write 2.43
4K Mixed 0.23
118% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 109%
Intenso Basic Line 64GB
57GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
3.31% Terrible
Read 10.1
Write 3
Mixed 3.35
6% 5.48 MB/s
4K Read 4.98
4K Write 0.005
4K Mixed 0.004
19% 1.66 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.31%
Great: 7%
Intenso Alu Line 8GB
4GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 22.3
Write 4.85
11% 13.6 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
59.9% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 19.3
61% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 17.5
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97 Anniversary Builds (Compare 540 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H97 Anniversary

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $494
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback