ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD3H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	9.23% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	138% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

System	Gigabyte Z87X-UD3H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD3H-CF (all builds)
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20140612
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 10 '15 at 16:00
Run Duration	363 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62 128,482 User benchmarks, average bench 68% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 112 2-Core 221 76% 166 Pts	4-Core 438 8-Core 423 58% 431 Pts	64-Core 425 26% 425 Pts
Poor: 51% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 5750 12,403 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Sapphire(174B E138) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.301.1001.0 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	9.23% Terrible	Lighting 12.1 Reflection 9.92 Parallax 10.1 10% 10.7 fps	MRender 9.1 Gravity 8.6 Splatting 11.3 8% 9.65 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.23% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
St1000dm003-9yn162 (TurboPC EX) 1TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 640GB free Firmware: CC4H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 204102040 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1260 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 88 60 694474400 (09) Power-on hours count 81 81 16816 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1041 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4295098371 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 46 572194845 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 493 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 37 37 126756 (C2) HDA temperature 29 54 77309411357 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 111961207484700 (F1) Unknown 100 253 60254654865739 (F2) Unknown 100 253 -137410552910641	19.5% Very poor	Read 190 Write 160 Mixed 131 36% 160 MB/s	4K Read 1.05 4K Write 9.99 4K Mixed 0.49 8% 3.84 MB/s	DQ Read 2.11 DQ Write 1.75 DQ Mixed 0.19 1% 1.35 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 19.5% Great: 34%
Samsung 850 PRO 256GB (TurboPC EX) 5 User benchmarks, average bench 132% 146GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 396 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 21 (B1) Unknown 99 99 7 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 64 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1 (F1) Unknown 99 99 3968291332	138% Outstanding	Read 525 Write 498 Mixed 499 113% 507 MB/s	4K Read 37.8 4K Write 149 4K Mixed 77.4 235% 88 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 139 DQ Mixed 149 140% 223 MB/s
Poor: 120% ↑ This bench: 138% Great: 138%
Seagate ST4000DX001-1CE168 (TurboPC EX) 4TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2TB free Firmware: CC44 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 143928520 (03) Spinup time 92 91 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 939 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 69 60 8791025 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3881 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 694 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4295032833 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 47 521863197 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 219 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 6298 (C2) HDA temperature 29 53 81604378653 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 73662984095764 (F1) Unknown 100 253 8184802052 (F2) Unknown 100 253 9609241321	67.8% Good	Read 91 Write 144 Mixed 103 85% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.72 4K Write 5.56 4K Mixed 0.8 222% 2.36 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 67.8% Great: 90%
BUFFALO External HDD USB Device (TurboPC EX) 2TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 237% 2TB free, PID 01f0 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	463% Outstanding	Read 115 Write 106 Mixed 77.5 124% 99.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.79 4K Write 138 4K Mixed 0.22 4,694% 46.2 MB/s	DQ Read 0.93 DQ Write 143 DQ Mixed 0.98 4,908% 48.4 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 463% Great: 463%
BUFFALO External HDD USB Device (TurboPC EX) 2TB 468GB free, PID 01f0 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	401% Outstanding	Read 108 Write 161 Mixed 111 170% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 114 4K Mixed 0.03 3,877% 38.2 MB/s	DQ Read 0.86 DQ Write 194 DQ Mixed 1.05 6,634% 65.3 MB/s

BUFFALO External HDD USB Device (TurboPC EX) 2TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 48GB free, PID 01ba Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	383% Outstanding	Read 45 Write 45 Mixed 43.2 57% 44.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 119 4K Mixed 0.17 4,062% 39.9 MB/s	DQ Read 0.75 DQ Write 171 DQ Mixed 0.83 5,850% 57.6 MB/s
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 383% Great: 383%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical GA-Z87X-UD3H-CF Builds (Compare 945 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD3H-CF

CPU
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	369x
Core i5-4670KIntel $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples	225x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	115x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	99x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	72x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	69x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	54x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $70Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	30x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	27x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 54%, 8,026 samples	30x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 49%, 28,220 samples	25x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $215

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback