Hp-pavilion AZ222AV-ABA HPE-180t

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics48.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHp-pavilion AZ222AV-ABA HPE-180t  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON TRUCKEE
Memory2.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100917
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 16 '18 at 14:20
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 960-$220
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 91.8
1-Core 82.2
2-Core 142
65% 105 Pts
4-Core 280
8-Core 410
43% 345 Pts
64-Core 385
24% 385 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1288 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.8.1
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.9% Average
Lighting 59.4
Reflection 61.9
Parallax 75.5
48% 65.6 fps
MRender 68.7
Gravity 60.3
Splatting 56.1
50% 61.7 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 1TB-$270
276GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 147 137 128 138 134 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.9% Average
Read 233
Write 231
Mixed 194
SusWrite 136
45% 199 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 32.2
4K Mixed 19.2
66% 22.5 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 120
100% 143 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 104%
Crucial MX200 1TB-$270
741GB free
Firmware: MU04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 162 172 157 176 177 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.2% Above average
Read 241
Write 215
Mixed 213
SusWrite 165
47% 208 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 30.4
4K Mixed 22.7
77% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 122
106% 155 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 104%
Seagate ST4000DX001-1CE168 (TurboPC EX) 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 155 161 141 159 143 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
90.5% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 78.9
Mixed 57
SusWrite 149
82% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 2.1
374% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 90%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 246GB
229GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 16 9.7 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
8.71% Terrible
Read 26.5
Write 16.7
Mixed 14.2
SusWrite 12.8
22% 17.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 1.4
75% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 8.71%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.7% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 15.6
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 11
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AZ222AV-ABA HPE-180t Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Hp-pavilion AZ222AV-ABA HPE-180t

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback