Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	37.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4 379 User benchmarks, average bench 67% None, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	76.9% Very good	Memory 77.9 1-Core 103 2-Core 207 73% 129 Pts	4-Core 411 8-Core 576 62% 493 Pts	64-Core 613 38% 613 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 77%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Virtual HD 137GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 36GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 32 32 35 33 35 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.6% Below average	Read 62.6 Write 94.7 Mixed 74.5 SusWrite 33.9 15% 66.4 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 19 4K Mixed 32.5 93% 26.3 MB/s	DQ Read 95.2 DQ Write 51.5 DQ Mixed 30.3 34% 59 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 67%
Virtual HD 790GB 104 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 720GB free Firmware: 1.1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 161 160 158 160 158 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	50.2% Above average	Read 195 Write 195 Mixed 197 SusWrite 159 42% 186 MB/s	4K Read 28.7 4K Write 26.5 4K Mixed 26.6 92% 27.3 MB/s	DQ Read 97.7 DQ Write 96.8 DQ Mixed 97.6 73% 97.4 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 52%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 1TB 58 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1TB free Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 26 27 27 27 26 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	18.1% Very poor	Read 35.4 Write 29.4 Mixed 32 SusWrite 26.5 23% 30.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1.8 312% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 112GB 323 User benchmarks, average bench 115% null MHz 1024, 32767, 32767, 32767, 15363 MB Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	125% Outstanding	MC Read 50.1 MC Write 53 MC Mixed 48.4 144% 50.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 17.7 45% 15.7 GB/s	Latency 84.6 47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 215%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,147x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,061x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	830x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	458x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	433x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325