bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.

Motherboard	Microsoft Virtual Machine
Memory	6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170602
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 07 '19 at 17:36
Run Duration	179 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2673 v4 1,172 User benchmarks, average bench 51% None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	48.3% Average	Memory 69.7 1-Core 90 2-Core 171 63% 110 Pts	4-Core 161 8-Core 144 21% 153 Pts	64-Core 132 8% 132 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Virtual HD 17GB 390 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 14GB free Firmware: 1.1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 3.1 13 12 13 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	11.7% Very poor	Read 22 Write 22.5 Mixed 22.6 SusWrite 9.7 4% 19.2 MB/s	4K Read 9.3 4K Write 9.5 4K Mixed 9.6 31% 9.47 MB/s	DQ Read 10 DQ Write 9.8 DQ Mixed 9.8 7% 9.87 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 31%
Virtual HD 136GB 575 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 114GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 10 9.1 11 8.5 12 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	10.2% Very poor	Read 23.5 Write 20.3 Mixed 7.8 SusWrite 10.2 11% 15.4 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 7.6 1,037% 4.33 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10.2% Great: 67%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 1TB 58 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1TB free Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 5.2 5.1 5.9 4.4 6.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	8.2% Terrible	Read 22.3 Write 22.2 Mixed 22.1 SusWrite 5.4 14% 18 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 1.4 246% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.2% Great: 68%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 1TB 58 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1TB free Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 2.2 1.8 2.2 1.5 2.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	7.21% Terrible	Read 22.1 Write 22.1 Mixed 22 SusWrite 2.3 13% 17.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 1.1 197% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 7.21% Great: 68%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 1TB 58 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1TB free Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 2.5 2.1 2.4 1.9 2.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	7.53% Terrible	Read 22.3 Write 22.3 Mixed 22.4 SusWrite 2.8 13% 17.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1.9 324% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 7.53% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% null MHz 1024, 7168 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	73.6% Very good	MC Read 30.1 MC Write 24.4 MC Mixed 31.4 82% 28.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.8 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 14 37% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,579 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2,061x
Core i7-2600Intel $201Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	1,591x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	948x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,147x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,062x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	830x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	458x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	433x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	521x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	379x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	300x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397