HP Z6 G4 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive188% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory144GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 144GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z6 G4 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81C6
Memory135.7 GB free of 144 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 22 '19 at 00:17
Run Duration271 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Silver 4116
CPU0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
68% Good
Memory 74.2
1-Core 81.5
2-Core 162
62% 106 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 595
56% 463 Pts
64-Core 1,236
76% 1,236 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 68%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P6000
Nvidia(10DE 11A0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1657 MHz, MLim: 2256 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 419.17
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
109% Outstanding
Lighting 137
Reflection 174
Parallax 184
111% 165 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 180
Splatting 121
113% 139 fps
Poor: 98%
This bench: 109%
Great: 128%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXY73H1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 837 624 578 504 475 461 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
188% Outstanding
Read 1,601
Write 1,435
Mixed 846
SusWrite 580
249% 1,115 MB/s
4K Read 45.8
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 54.2
196% 69.4 MB/s
DQ Read 696
DQ Write 573
DQ Mixed 651
483% 640 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 188%
Great: 259%
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
226GB free
Firmware: CXY73H1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 863 641 638 638 638 640 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
203% Outstanding
Read 1,651
Write 1493
Mixed 862
SusWrite 676
261% 1,171 MB/s
4K Read 47.4
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 54.7
203% 72.7 MB/s
DQ Read 803
DQ Write 720
DQ Mixed 762
572% 762 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 203%
Great: 259%
Kingston A1000 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-$53
217GB free
Firmware: E8FK11.L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 536 256 257 256 256 256 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 776
Write 816
Mixed 740
SusWrite 303
148% 658 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 87.8
4K Mixed 37.4
139% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 699
DQ Write 594
DQ Mixed 567
447% 620 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 121%
Great: 141%
Kingston A1000 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-$53
22GB free
Firmware: E8FK11.L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 738
Write 792
Mixed 742
170% 757 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 87.5
4K Mixed 36.4
137% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 695
DQ Write 571
DQ Mixed 583
450% 617 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 141%
G-raid with Thunderbolt 12TB
7TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 376 376 369 364 364 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
198% Outstanding
Read 322
Write 323
Mixed 99
SusWrite 368
202% 278 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.3
279% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 198%
Great: 207%
Lacie Rugged USB-C 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1153
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 106 105 105 102 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 77.2
Write 98
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 103
64% 86.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.6
193% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 69%
External RAID 6TB
1.5TB free, PID ce34
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
21.1% Poor
Read 40.7
Write 41.2
Mixed 41
SusWrite 41.2
56% 41 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
94% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GR7AFR8N-VK Micron 36ASF4G72PZ-2G6D1 Micron 36ASF4G72PZ-2G6D1 Micron 36ASF4G72PZ-2G6D1 Micron 36ASF4G72PZ-2G6D1 HMA81GR7AFR8N-VK 143GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
134% Outstanding
MC Read 56.3
MC Write 50.8
MC Mixed 58.9
158% 55.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 13.1
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 92
44% 92 ns
Poor: 121%
This bench: 134%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z6 G4 Workstation Builds (Compare 633 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

System: HP Z6 G4 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback