Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 7 Pro

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive231% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 7 Pro  (all builds)
Memory20 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181106
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 04 '19 at 20:44
Run Duration489 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9920X-$595
CPU0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 70.9
1-Core 118
2-Core 219
75% 136 Pts
4-Core 436
8-Core 845
76% 641 Pts
64-Core 1,943
120% 1,943 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$365
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 419.17
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
132% Outstanding
Lighting 160
Reflection 215
Parallax 233
131% 203 fps
MRender 252
Gravity 215
Splatting 137
158% 201 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 132%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$60
716GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0906B Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1255 886 913 909 928 914 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
231% Outstanding
Read 2099
Write 1,541
Mixed 1,425
SusWrite 967
337% 1,508 MB/s
4K Read 54.7
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 77.9
249% 85.9 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 217
DQ Mixed 128
123% 194 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 231%
Great: 372%
HP EX950 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$207
1TB free
Firmware: R1106C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1797 1792 1804 1810 1828 1786 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
293% Outstanding
Read 2,192
Write 1,714
Mixed 1,358
SusWrite 1,803
396% 1,767 MB/s
4K Read 56.2
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 80.1
266% 94.5 MB/s
DQ Read 322
DQ Write 213
DQ Mixed 181
158% 239 MB/s
Poor: 194%
This bench: 293%
Great: 379%
Intel Optane+1.8T 2TB
965GB free
Firmware: 17.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 547 541 553 548 445 440 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 47% Great: 117%
SanDisk Ultra 3D 2TB-$142
925GB free
Firmware: X61170RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 424 430 428 438 435 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 427
Write 390
Mixed 348
SusWrite 430
90% 399 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 53.8
4K Mixed 29.3
103% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 129
123% 202 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 119%
External USB3.0 1TB
688GB free
Firmware: 0204
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 349
Write 355
Mixed 331
77% 345 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 35.7
4K Mixed 26.4
87% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 97.6
DQ Mixed 156
110% 141 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 90%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 6TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 358 350 361 364 359 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
194% Outstanding
Read 322
Write 224
Mixed 92.2
SusWrite 356
180% 248 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 1.2
253% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 194%
Great: 293%
HPT DISK 0_0 9TB
6.5TB free
Firmware: 4.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 137 137 139 137 140 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Read 200
Write 91.2
Mixed 55
SusWrite 136
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.9
202% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 122%
H/W RAID 5 12TB
5TB free, PID 0567
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 132 141 140 135 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 172
Write 100
Mixed 52
SusWrite 132
143% 114 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
22% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 83%
SSI H/W RAID0 6TB
3.5TB free, PID 9561
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 154 153 151 156 150 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68.4% Good
Read 217
Write 156
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 156
187% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
55% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 109%
ORICO H/ W RAID0 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 0539
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 147 146 146 151 146 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 192
Write 186
Mixed 100
SusWrite 150
207% 157 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
55% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 98%
ASMT ASM1352R-Fast 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 1356
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 300
Write 284
Mixed 249
352% 278 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 38.1
4K Mixed 24.7
2,212% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 25.6
DQ Write 52.8
DQ Mixed 32.9
3,010% 37.1 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 227%
CineRAID CR-H218 2TB
2TB free, PID 1352
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 473
Write 350
Mixed 367
489% 397 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 43
4K Mixed 28.6
2,518% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 27.4
DQ Write 54.3
DQ Mixed 36.2
3,180% 39.3 MB/s
StarTech .com RAID 0 1TB
931GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 294
Write 246
Mixed 244
327% 261 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 38.7
4K Mixed 24
2,209% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 25.1
DQ Write 51
DQ Mixed 30.2
2,855% 35.4 MB/s
JMicron Tech 512GB
267GB free, PID 0562
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 506
Write 497
Mixed 483
637% 495 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 24.5
4K Mixed 32.9
2,060% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 38.3
DQ Write 63.8
DQ Mixed 45.4
3,856% 49.2 MB/s
Poor: 61% Great: 261%
WD My Passport 07B8 500GB
336GB free, PID 07b8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 93
Write 94.3
Mixed 56.3
101% 81.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
101% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3600 C17 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 43.7
MC Mixed 25.4
92% 32.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 9.2
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 99.2
40% 99.2 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 7 Pro Builds (Compare 74 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 7 Pro

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $694
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback