Dell Precision Tower 5810

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive87.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Precision Tower 5810
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 5810  (all builds)
Memory39 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201019
Uptime5.3 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '21 at 20:30
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 69.4
1-Core 67.2
2-Core 202
61% 113 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 546
57% 458 Pts
64-Core 547
34% 547 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K620-$170
Nvidia(10DE 1098) 2GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Lighting 13.7
Reflection 16.3
Parallax 11.1
11% 13.7 fps
MRender 11.4
Gravity 13.4
Splatting 14.5
11% 13.1 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
235GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 398 425 431 421 428 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 453
Write 398
Mixed 356
SusWrite 419
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 50.1
4K Mixed 32.7
107% 36.1 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 207
DQ Mixed 233
176% 239 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 124%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
825GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 95 96 96 96 97 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 95.3
Write 98
Mixed 46.7
SusWrite 95.7
61% 83.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 58%
ST2000DM 008-2FR102 2TB
2TB free, PID 1356
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 9.5 9.5 9.6 9.7 9.9 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.6% Very poor
Read 34.7
Write 30.2
Mixed 27.9
SusWrite 9.5
33% 25.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.1
104% 2.57 MB/s
ASMT ASM1352R-Fast 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 1356
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 20 19 19 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.1% Very poor
Read 34.3
Write 33.4
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 19.1
38% 28.7 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 2.1
175% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 227%
ST2000DM 008-2FR102 2TB
2TB free, PID 1356
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 9.5 9.5 9.7 9.7 9.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.9% Very poor
Read 33.6
Write 30.6
Mixed 26.6
SusWrite 9.7
32% 25.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1.2
113% 2.77 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 Hynix HMA81GR7MFR8N-UH 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 Hynix HMA81GR7MFR8N-UH 48GB
2133, 2400, 2133, 2400 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68.4% Good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 24.1
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 21
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Tower 5810 Builds (Compare 5,334 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 5810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback