Acer Aspire M7811

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire M7811  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire M7811
Memory3.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100323
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 04 '19 at 17:47
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$339
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 94.1
1-Core 83.6
2-Core 164
69% 114 Pts
4-Core 287
8-Core 365
42% 326 Pts
64-Core 363
22% 363 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 320
Sapphire(174B 2150) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.21% Terrible
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 6.42
Parallax 1.91
0% 2.8 fps
MRender 6.24
Gravity 3.2
Splatting 3.61
4% 4.35 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.21%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$64
455GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 41 38 37 36 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
34.6% Below average
Read 77.5
Write 80
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 42.8
48% 64.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 57%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
293GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 105 108 108 107 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 96
Write 93.7
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 107
65% 88.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 67%
TDKMedia Trans-It Drive 8GB
6GB free, PID 061a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 6.1 5.9 5.9 5.1 6 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
6.06% Terrible
Read 14.5
Write 4.2
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 5.8
8% 7.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
47% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.06%
Great: 8%
WD 10EAVS External 1TB
37GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 17 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 29.5
Write 21
Mixed 22.7
SusWrite 18.6
30% 22.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 22%
SAMSUNG HD503HI 500GB
216GB free, PID 0475
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 18 18 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 30.5
Write 22.2
Mixed 23.7
SusWrite 18.7
31% 23.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
86% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673EH1-CH9 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
38% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 10.8
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 11.9
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 59.5
67% 59.5 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 38%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire M7811 Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M7811

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $407
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $256Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $48G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback