HP 700-074

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.26% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 700-074  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF3
Memory8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130919
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 02 '19 at 22:10
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4430-$124
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 90.3
2-Core 179
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 344
46% 341 Pts
64-Core 327
20% 327 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
Zotac(19DA 1258) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 418.91
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
7.26% Terrible
Lighting 8.3
Reflection 7.77
Parallax 9.91
7% 8.66 fps
MRender 8.81
Gravity 10.2
Splatting 10.7
8% 9.91 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.26%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$49
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 125 125 128 137 138 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 95.7
Write 97.7
Mixed 59
SusWrite 128
70% 95.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 114%
KINGSTON SV300S37A120G 120GB
112GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 39 41 41 42 42 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
77% Very good
Read 39.7
Write 41.2
Mixed 39.2
SusWrite 41
55% 40.3 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 19.4
4K Mixed 13.5
1,161% 14.7 MB/s
DQ Read 12.2
DQ Write 19.6
DQ Mixed 14.3
1,198% 15.4 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 77%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
53.7% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 13.8
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 12.7
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 700-074 Builds (Compare 70 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP 700-074

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $167
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback