Asus P6T DELUXE V2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics4.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P6T DELUXE V2  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 30 '15 at 03:38
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$94
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 69.4
2-Core 138
47% 104 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 399
41% 331 Pts
64-Core 399
25% 399 Pts
Poor: 46% Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4670
PwrHis(1787 2009) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
4.65% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 8.35
Parallax 3.72
5% 5.89 fps
MRender 5.71
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 7.43
5% 5.68 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.65%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 256GB-$261
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.5% Average
Read 225
Write 199
Mixed 181
45% 202 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 41.1
4K Mixed 13.8
70% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 22.1
DQ Write 51.3
DQ Mixed 13.6
17% 29 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 86%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95
186GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 83.6
Write 79.2
Mixed 39.5
50% 67.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 2.07
4K Mixed 0.37
109% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 69%
WDC WD10EZEX-00R 1TB
526GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18% Very poor
Read 32
Write 29.2
Mixed 28.4
38% 29.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.16
4K Write 2.18
4K Mixed 0.32
89% 1.22 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18%
Great: 50%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 64GB-$72
35GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 33
Write 29
Mixed 17.8
32% 26.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.21
4K Write 7.6
4K Mixed 2.96
382% 5.59 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 111%
Typical P6T DELUXE V2 Builds (Compare 1,049 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P6T DELUXE V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $310
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback