Today's hottest deals

Asrock J4105M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock J4105M  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colori, 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180504
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '19 at 18:21
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J4105
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Memory 43.1
1-Core 52.2
2-Core 88.4
36% 61.2 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 162
26% 185 Pts
64-Core 161
10% 161 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 42%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
ASRock(1849 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4836
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
2.42% Terrible
Lighting 2.43
Reflection 3.12
Parallax 2.44
2% 2.66 fps
MRender 3.67
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 5.39
3% 3.82 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.42%
Great: 2%
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Gigabyte(1458 3546) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.93% Terrible
Lighting 2.33
Reflection 2.62
Parallax 1.91
2% 2.28 fps
MRender 2.95
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 2.13
2% 2.47 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.93%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDPR-CL100-120-G2 120GB
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N1209B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 306 319 326 327 330 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 361
Write 318
Mixed 177
SusWrite 310
65% 291 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 41.2
4K Mixed 6.7
52% 20.8 MB/s
DQ Read 74.1
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 12.8
38% 78.7 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Goodram GR2400D464L17S/4G 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.6% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 9.5
26% 9.17 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 3
8% 2.9 GB/s
Latency 188
21% 188 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical J4105M Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock J4105M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $26
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback