Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics74.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive45.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190823
Uptime2 Days
Run DateSep 02 '21 at 19:36
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$100
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Memory 79.6
1-Core 110
2-Core 220
76% 136 Pts
4-Core 413
8-Core 670
66% 541 Pts
64-Core 908
56% 908 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.6% Very good
Lighting 94.2
Reflection 95.4
Parallax 87.1
77% 92.2 fps
MRender 97.2
Gravity 88.9
Splatting 76
70% 87.4 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDPR-CL100-120-G2 120GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 68 58 50 52 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 443
Write 80
Mixed 109
SusWrite 69
38% 175 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 29.5
4K Mixed 18.1
69% 22.6 MB/s
DQ Read 89.1
DQ Write 34.9
DQ Mixed 27
29% 50.3 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 78%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
189GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 71.3
Mixed 45.6
44% 58.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
84.5% Excellent
MC Read 33.9
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 27.4
87% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.7
SC Write 30.8
SC Mixed 24.9
75% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 81.4
49% 81.4 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 43: 3R 5G 13B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
43% 26% 80 330 263 144 27" 1920 1080 AUS27AF VG278
History: Score 22: 2R 3G 3B | Score 43: 3R 5G 13B
Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,998 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $425
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback