Today's hottest deals

Asus M2A-MX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 16%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus M2A-MX  (all builds)
Memory0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '19 at 15:37
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4800+-$150
Socket AM2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Memory 57.6
1-Core 25.1
2-Core 56.5
31% 46.4 Pts
4-Core 34.1
8-Core 55.4
6% 44.8 Pts
64-Core 59.9
4% 59.9 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 240
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.44
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.47% Terrible
Lighting 5.97
Reflection 6.65
Parallax 2.53
5% 5.05 fps
MRender 6.05
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.65
4% 4.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.47%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Maxtor 6V080E0 82GB-$59
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VA111630
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 28 34 23 40 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Read 32.7
Write 26
Mixed 14.8
SusWrite 30.6
19% 26 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.1
38% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
MC Read 6.2
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 5.3
16% 5.6 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 2.3
SC Mixed 3.7
9% 3.1 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M2A-MX Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

Motherboard: Asus M2A-MX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback